On June 4, 2008, the seller of Travis Victor Alexander (July 28, 1977 - June 4, 2008) was killed by his ex-girlfriend, Jodi Ann Arias (born July 9, 1980) home of Alexander in Mesa, Arizona, USA. Arias was convicted of first-degree murder on May 8, 2013 and sentenced to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole on April 13, 2015, nearly seven years after the assassination.
At the time of the murder, Alexander suffered many knife wounds and a shot to the head. Arias testified that he killed Alexander to defend himself, but did not convince a jury. Murders and courts receive widespread media attention in the United States.
Video Murder of Travis Alexander
​​â € <â €
Travis Alexander was born on July 28, 1977, in Riverside, California to Gary David Alexander (1948-1997) and Pamela Elizabeth Morgan Alexander (1953-2005). His childhood is very difficult because both parents are drug addicts. At the age of 11, Travis moved in with his father's grandparents, Norma Jean Preston Alexander Sarvey (1932-2012) and her husband, James Sarvey (1938-2002), who introduced him to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. After the death of his father in July 1997, seven of his siblings were also brought by their father's grandmother. Alexander is a salesman and motivational speaker for Legal Services Pre-Paid (PPL).
Jodi Arias was born on July 9, 1980, in Salinas, California to William and Sandra (nÃÆ' Â © e Allen) Arias. He and Alexander met in September 2006 at a PPL conference in Las Vegas, Nevada. Arias was converted to Alexander Mormon's faith and, on 26 November 2006, was baptized into the LDS Church in a ceremony in southern California. Alexander and Arias began dating in February 2007. Arias moved to Mesa to stay closer to Alexander. In March 2007, he moved to Yreka, California, and stayed there with his grandparents.
Maps Murder of Travis Alexander
Murder
Alexander was killed on June 4, 2008. He suffered from 27 to 29 stab wounds, his throat has been sliced, and he suffered a gunshot wound to the head. Medical Examiner Kevin Horn testified that the veins of Alexander, the communist carotid artery, and the trachea had been slashed and that Alexander had a defensive wound in his hand. Horn further testified that Alexander "probably" had died at the time the shot was inflicted, and that his back wounds were shallow. Alexander's death was dominated by a murder. She is buried at the Olivewood Cemetery in Riverside, California.
Invention and investigation
In early 2008, Alexander told the PPL that Arias would join him for a work-related trip to CancÃÆ'ºn, Mexico, scheduled for June 15. In April, Alexander asks to change his travel companion to another female friend. On May 28, 2008, a robbery took place at the residence of the Arias' grandparents, with whom Arias lived. Among the missing objects is the.25 caliber automatic Colt. (ACP), which was never found. This then becomes significant as the shell casing of a.25 caliber rotation is found near Alexander's body at the site of the murder.
On June 2, between 1 am and 3 am, Arias called Alexander four times but did not seem to make it, as the longest call was seventeen seconds. After 3 am, Alexander summoned Arias twice, the first time for eighteen minutes, the second for 41 minutes. At 4:03, Arias called Alexander back and the call lasted two minutes, 48 ​​seconds. Both these calls, as well as the transcripts, are presented in the Jodi Arias trial. At 5:39 am, Arias went south to rent a car for a long trip to Utah, as stated in evidence by gasoline purchases at Shell Food Mart in Yreka, California. On June 2, at 08:04, Arias rented a car at Budget Rent a Car in Redding. He suggests he will return the car to Budget in Redding. Arias visited friends in southern California en route to Utah for a PPL work conference and to meet with Ryan Burns, a co-worker of PPL. By evening on 3 June 2008, Arias apparently left for Salt Lake City.
Alexander missed an important conference call on the night of June 4th. The following day, Arias met with Burns in the Salt Lake City neighborhood of West Jordan, Utah and attended a business meeting for the conference. Burns then says he saw Arias's previously blonde hair is now dark brown, and he has a cut on his hand. On June 6, Arias left Salt Lake City and drove west toward California. He called Alexander several times and left some voicemail messages for him. He also accessed Alexander's mobile voice mail system. When Arias returned the car on June 7, the car was driven about 2,800 miles (4,500 km). The rental officer testified that the car had lost the floor mat and had red stains on the front and back of the seat. It can not be verified that the car has a mat when Arias picks it up and any stains can not be verified because the car is cleared before the police can check it.
On June 9, unable to reach Alexander, a group of worried friends went to his house. His roommates initially stated that he was out of town. After discovering the key to Alexander's master bedroom, his friends entered and found a large pool of blood in the hallway to the main bathroom, where his body was found in the bathroom. In a 9-1-1 call made to the authorities (not heard by the jury), Alexander's friend mentioned Arias, which Alexander said followed him, accessed his Facebook account, and cut his tires. When looking for Alexander's house, the police found his newly purchased digital camera damaged in a washing machine. Police can recover deleted images that show Arias and Alexander in sexually suggestive poses, taken at around 1:40 pm on 4 June. The last photo of Alexander alive, showing him in the bathroom, was taken at 17:29 that day. The photographs taken moments later show someone who is believed to be Alexander "very bloody" on the bathroom floor. A coconut husk was found along the wall in the hallway of the bathroom; contains DNA from Arias and Alexander.
On July 9, 2008, Arias was indicted by a grand jury in Maricopa County, Arizona for the first-degree murder of Alexander. He was arrested at his home on July 15 and extradited to Arizona on September 5. Arias pleaded not guilty on September 11. During this time, he gave several different accounts of his involvement in Alexander's death. He initially told police he had not been in Mesa on the day of the murder and last saw Alexander in March 2007. Arias later told police that two intruders had entered Alexander's house, killed him and attacked him. Two years after his arrest, Arias told police that he killed Alexander in self-defense, claiming that he had been a victim of domestic violence.
Pre-test
On 6 April 2009, a movement to reconsider the movement of the accused to disqualify the Maricopa District Attorney Office was rejected. On May 18, the court ordered Arias to submit to IQ tests and competency tests. Then, in January 2011, a plea filed details of attempts by Arias lawyers to get text messages and emails. At first the prosecutor told the defense attorney that no text messages were available that Alexander had sent or received, and were then ordered to hand over several hundred such messages. Mesa police detective Esteban Flores told defense lawyers that there is no "extraordinary" among Alexander's emails; about 8,000 were submitted to defense in June 2009.
Trial
Jury selection
The trial begins at the Maricopa District High Court before Judge Sherry K. Stephens on December 10, 2011. The initial jury selection begins on December 10, 2012. During the jury's election on December 20, Arias's defense lawyers argue that the prosecution "systematically excludes" women and Africans -America; prosecutor Juan Martinez said race and sex were irrelevant to his decision to attack a particular juror. Judge Stephens ruled that the prosecutor did not show bias in the jury selection.
Guilt phrase
In the opening of the argument on January 2, 2013, Martinez sought the death penalty. Arias were represented by advisors appointed L. Kirk Nurmi and Jennifer Willmott, who argue that Alexander's death was a justifiable assassin made to defend himself.
Burns testified that when Arias visited him in Utah, the two spent hours hugging and kissing on big bean bag chairs. She tells him that she has cut her hand with broken glass while working at a restaurant called Margaritaville. A detective testified that no restaurant with that name ever existed in the Yreka area; at that time, Arias was working at a restaurant called Casa Ramos. Later, Arias testified that after he cut his finger: "I have margarita margaritas to make it." Later, the prosecution argued that since the.25-caliber round was discovered near Alexander's body and that the same caliber weapon was stolen from Arias' residence in Yreka a week earlier, he had launched a tear and used the weapon to kill Alexander. Martinez claims Arias has been stalking Alexander and has slashed his tires twice. In addition, in the last days before his death, Alexander called him the "sociopath" and "the worst thing that ever happened to me", and declared him scared of him.
Arias took a position in his own defense on February 4, 2013, testifying for a total of eighteen days; The length of time Arias spent in the stands was described by criminal defender Mark Geragos as "unprecedented". On the first day of his testimony, Arias recounts the violence perpetrated by his parents since the age of about seven years. He testified that he rented a car in Redding because the Budget website gave him two choices, one north and one in the south, and his brother living in Redding. On the second day at the stand, Arias says that their sex life includes oral and anal sex; she said that anal sex was painful for her for the first time they shared it, and that while she considers these sex forms as real sex, Alexander does not technically disagree with the rules of Mormon on regular sexual intercourse. Arias says that they end up having sex, but less often. The cell phone tape was played in which Alexander said he wanted to link him to a tree and have anal sex with him as he dressed up as Little Red Riding Hood, which seemed to Arias enthusiastically responded. Arias testified that Alexander had secretly found boys and young women sexually attractive and that he was trying to help him with this encouragement.
Arias testified that his relationship with Alexander became increasingly harsh physically and emotionally. Arias said that Alexander shook him saying, "I'm sick of you", then started "yelling at me", after which he "slammed me on the floor at the foot of his bed" and taunted him, saying "do not act like that hurts", before he called him sucks and kicks it in the ribs. After that, Arias said "he went kicking me again, and I put my hands down." Arias raised his left hand in the courtroom, indicating that his ring finger was crooked. According to Arias, their relationship dysfunction peaked when he killed him in self-defense after he became angry when he dropped his camera, forcing him to fight for his life. This is a different third report from Alexander's death given by Arias, who both prosecutors, courtroom observers, and later jurors felt severely undermined his credibility.
Arias responded to the comments he made in a September 2008 interview with the syndicated news program Inside Edition , which had been screened earlier in the trial. In the interview, he said: "No jury will punish me... because I am innocent You can mark my words about it." Discussing the statement during his testimony, Arias said, "At the time of [interview], I have a plan to commit suicide, so I am very sure that no jury will punish me, because I do not expect any of you to be here." At the close of Arias's cross-examination, Martinez replayed the video and prompted Arias to affirm that he said during the interview that he would not be punished for his innocence. At the end of the guilt phase, the jury's foreman William Zervakos presented the same opinion to both the jury and the observer when he told ABC Good Morning America that Arias's testimony was of no use to him. "I think eighteen days hurt him, I think he is not a good witness," he said.
Beginning March 14, psychologist Richard Samuels testified for a defense for nearly six days. He said Arias might suffer from acute stress at the time of the murder, sending his body into "fight or flight" mode to defend himself, which causes his brain to stop storing memory. In response to a question a jury asked if this scenario could happen even if this was a planned killing, as the prosecutor demanded, he replied: "Is it possible? Yes. Is it possible? Samuels also diagnosed Arias with post traumatic stress disorder. Martinez attacked Samuels' credibility, accusing him of forming a relationship with Arias and becoming biased; Samuels had previously testified he had mercy for Arias. Beginning on March 26, Alyce LaViolette, a psychotherapist specializing in domestic violence, testified that Arias is a victim of domestic violence, and that most victims do not tell anyone about abuse because they feel embarrassed and humiliated. LaViolette summarized an email from Alexander's close friend: "They basically advised Ms. Arias to move out of the relationship... that Mr. Alexander has committed violence against women." The jury asked 160 questions to LaViolette, many of whom focused on Arias' credibility.
Clinical psychologist Janeen DeMarte testified to the prosecution that Arias did not suffer from PTSD or amnesia, and that she found no evidence Alexander had abused Arias. In contrast, DeMarte said Arias suffered from a threshold personality disorder, showing signs of immaturity and an "unstable sense of identity." People who suffer from such disorders "have feelings of fear left behind by others," DeMarte told the jury. The last defense witness was a psychologist. Robert Geffner, who said that DeMarte's "no match" diagnostic limit and all tests taken by Arias since his arrest led to an anxiety disorder derived from trauma. He also said tests showed that he answered questions honestly, without lying. Following Geffner's testimony, the country reminded Dr. Horn, who gave further testimony about gunshot wounds, and summoned Dr. Jill Hayes, a forensic forensic neurologist, who denied Geffner's testimony that the MMPI test was not directed to diagnose a personality disorder threshold, concluding a long day in court at 8:29 pm.
On April 24, in response to Arias's previous testimony of purchasing a five-gallon gas canister from a Walmart store in Salinas on June 3, 2008, that he returned the same day, the prosecutor called Amanda Webb, an employee of only Walmart in Salinas, to the stands. Webb said that according to Walmart's records, no one returned the five-gallon gas can on that date, and that Arias returned a gas canister a week later than on June 3.
In the closing argument on May 4, the Arias defense argues that the theory of premeditation makes no sense. "What happened at the time? Relationships, chaos, ending in chaos, nothing about what happened on the 4th of June in a well-planned bathroom... Can not it be after everything they've experienced in the relationship, that he just jerked?... In the end, if Miss Arias is guilty of any crime, it is a murder crime and nothing more. "As a rebuttal, Martinez describes the extent and range of Alexander's wounds. "There is no evidence that he ever touched his hand, forever.No one indicates that this is something less than a massacre.There is no way to calm a woman who does not want to leave her alone," he said.
Arias' testimony was added to the very long defense section of the guilty phase of the trial, which caused problems with the retention of the jurors. On April 3, a juror was dismissed for "mistake". The defense team requested a cancellation of the trial, which the judge rejected. On April 12, another juror was released for health reasons. The third jury was sacked on April 25 after being arrested for DUI offenses. As of April 25, 2012, defense costs have reached nearly $ 1.7 million, paid by taxpayers.
On 7 May 2013, after 15 hours of consideration, Arias was found guilty of first-degree murder. Of the twelve jurors, five jurors consider him guilty of first-degree premeditated murder, and seven jurors consider him guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and murder of crime. When the guilty verdict was read, Alexander's family smiled and hugged. People outside the courtroom started cheering and singing.
Germination phase
After first-degree murder, the prosecutor is required to convince the jury that the murder is "cruel, vicious, or depraved" in order for them to determine that Arias qualifies for the death penalty. The trial aggravation phase begins on May 15, 2013. The only witness is a medical examiner who performs an autopsy. Arias lawyers, who have repeatedly requested to withdraw from the case, gave only a brief opening statement and closed the argument, in which they said adrenaline rushing through Alexander's body might have prevented him from feeling very ill during his death. Attorney Martinez showed photos of the corpse and crime scene to the jury, then stopped for two minutes silent to illustrate how long she said that Alexander should die at the hands of Arias. After less than three hours of consideration, the jury decided that Arias qualified for the death penalty.
Penalty Phase
The punishment phase begins on May 16, 2013, when the prosecutor summoned a member of the Alexander family to offer a victim impact statement, in an attempt to convince the jury that Arias's crime deserves the death penalty.
On May 21, 2013, Arias offered an allocation, in which he pleaded for a life sentence. Arias acknowledges that his defense for life is a reversal of his statement to a TV reporter shortly after his conviction, when he says he prefers the death penalty. "Every time I say that, I mean it, but I have no perspective," he said. "To this day, I can not imagine standing before you and asking you to give me life." He said that he changed his mind not to bring more pain to his family members, who were in the courtroom. At one point, he raised a white shirt with the word "congratulations" written on it, telling the jury that he would sell clothes and donate all proceeds to the victims of domestic violence. He also said he would donate his hair to Locks of Love while in jail, and had done it three times while in jail.
That night, in a prison council interview with The Arizona Republic, 12 News and NBC Today, Arias said he did not know if the jury would return alive or dead. "Whatever they return with me will have to deal with it, I have no other choice." Regarding his verdict, he said, "It feels like a great sense of unfaithfulness, I feel betrayed, in fact, by a jury, I hope they will see something for what they are. I feel really horrible for my family and what they think."
On May 23, 2013, Arias's trial sentence phase resulted in a hanging jury, prompting the judge to declare a cancellation of the hearing for that phase. The jury has reached an 8-4 decision in favor of the death penalty.
After the lie was announced and the jury was released, the foreman judge stated that he believed Arias was mentally abused, but that was not enough to forgive his crime. He also said, "I think 18 days hurt him, I think he is not a good witness We were accused of innocence, right? But he stood there so long, there are so many conflicting stories." He said the jury found the responsibility for weighing the extraordinary death penalty, but was horrified when their efforts ended with the cancellation of the trial. "In the end, we were mentally and emotionally exhausted," he said. "I think we were horrified to learn that they had actually canceled the trial, and we felt we had failed."
On May 30, 2013, Maricopa District Attorney Bill Montgomery discussed the next steps at a press conference. He said that he believes an impartial jury can sit down, but it is possible that the lawyer and the victim's family can agree to cancel the trial for life imprisonment without parole. Arias said, "I do not think there is a jury pool that is not tarnished anywhere in the world right now, that's how it feels, but I still believe in that system to some degree, so we'll only discuss it if it happens." Defense lawyers replied, "If the diagnosis made by State psychologists is correct, the Maricopa County Procuratorate Office is trying to impose the death penalty on a mentally ill woman who has no previous criminal history.This is not the responsibility for Ms. Arias' defense of advice to resolve the case."
Appeal
During the trial, defense counsel lodged a confusion in January, April and May 2012.
Arias's lawyers argued in January that Detectives Esteban Flores, the main Mesa police detective in the case, vowed to himself during the 2008 pretrial hearings aimed at determining whether the death penalty should be considered an option for the jury. Flores testified at a 2009 hearing based on his own review of the scene, and discussions with the medical examiner, it was clear that Alexander had been shot in the forehead first. Contrary to Flores's testimony at the 2009 hearing, the medical examiner told the jury that the shot might paralyze Alexander; considering his extensive defensive wounds, including the stabbing and slash marks on his hands, arms, and legs, it was unlikely that the shot would come first. Flores denies perjury and says during the trial that she only misunderstands what the medical examiner told her.
In April, the defender claimed the prosecutor had acted inappropriately and said that the case was similar to the modern age equivalent to Salem's witch court. In the motion, the defense team argued that "the mistake of prosecution has ensnared this process with a degree of injury that can not be cured by any other means." The motion also states there is "a circus atmosphere as it is in the courtroom" and prosecutor Juan Martinez has been shouting at witnesses, attacking witnesses on a personal level, and has thrown evidence. The motion also alleged that Martinez chose to release the evidence and pose for photography with his fans on the steps of the courthouse. The lawyer claims that Arias is in a position where he can not provide a complete defense, and the only constitutional course is to state a cancellation of the trial.
On May 20, 2012, defense lawyers filed a mistake. The motion alleged that a defense witness who had given testimony on the previous Friday, the 17th, began receiving threats, including threats against his life if he testified on Arias' behalf. The day prior to filing, the witness contacted an advisor to Arias, stating that he was no longer willing to testify because of this threat. The motion continued, "It should also be noted that this threat follows what is made for Alyce LaViolette, a record made of an ex-parte and under a seal." The motion was rejected, like a motion to stay in a process that has given time to appeal the decision to the Arizona Supreme Court.
On May 29, 2013, the Arizona Supreme Court refused to hear the appeals filed three months earlier, also rejected by the Arizona Court of Appeals. Nurmi has asked the high court to remove the irritating factor of cruelty because the judge has allowed him to go forward based on different theories about how the murder took place. The prime detective had originally claimed that the shots had occurred the first time, followed by stabbing and slicing the throat; Based on that theory, Stephens decides there is a possible cause to find the crime has been committed in a very cruel way, an aggravating factor under state law. After this initial trial, the medical examiner testified that the shots occurred after death.
Court re-enactment
On October 21, 2013, an Arias retrial trial begins. An opening statement was given, and a trial of evidence was held. The prosecutor witnessed Amanda Webb, who was summoned in the first trial to deny Arias' testimony that he returned the gas can to Walmart on May 8, 2007, admitting that he did not know whether all records were moved after the store was relocated. After the holiday holiday, the court resumed in January 2014. The Mesa police expert admitted that Alexander's laptop had viruses and pornography, contrary to testimony in the first trial in 2013. The jury consultation began on February 12, 2014. On March 2, 2014, the jury told Judge Stephens that they are deadlocked. Arias's lawyers asked for a cancellation of the trial. Stephens rejected the request, read additional instructions to the jury, and ordered them to continue the discussion. On March 5, 2014 Stephens declared a cancellation because the jurors, who negotiated for about 26 hours over five days, stumbled to a 11-1 deadlock in favor of the death penalty. The penalty is scheduled for April 7, 2014, with Stephens having the option to punish Arias for either life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, or with the possibility of parole after 25 years. On April 13, Stephens sentenced Arias for life without the possibility of parole. Until March 5, 2015, Arias court cost about $ 3 million.
In an interview on April 8, 2014, Arias lawyer Jennifer Willmott discussed the social media furore, the threat of murder he received, Arias's statement on punishment, the jury of disagreement, and stated that he believed that Arias testified truthfully.
In June 2014, following a recovery hearing, Arias was ordered to pay more than $ 32,000 to Alexander's brothers. Arias lawyer stated that it was about 1/3 of the amount requested.
Incarceration
In 2016, Arias is based in Arizona Department of Corrections # 281129, located at Arizona State Prison Complex - Perryville. He started his sentence on Lumley's maximum security unit complex, but he has the possibility of being downgraded to a medium level of security.
Media
The Associated Press reports that, on November 3, 2014, "the public should be able to witness testimony in the Jodi Arias trial". This decision by a panel of three Arizona High Court judges ruled out the decision of Maricopa High Court Judge Sherry Stephens to "allow a witness to personally testify as a jury [weighing] whether to give [Arias] the death penalty". The case, which has been broadcast several times throughout the world, since the conclusion of the first trial has been marked by secrecy, when Judge Stephens held a secret (non-public) hearing. As a result of the "secrecy" movement, an unknown defense witness was allowed to testify in private. Although Judge Stephens' decision had been rejected, "the witness of the mystery that testifies... at the beginning of the defense case" (Associated Press) has not been disclosed to the public.
The case was featured on the episode of 48 Hours Mystery: Picture Perfect in 2008, an interview which, for the first time in the history of <48 Hours , was used as evidence in the hearing of the death penalty. On September 24, 2008, Inside Edition interviewed Arias at Maricopa County Prison where he stated, "No jury will punish me... because I am innocent and you can mark my words about that. there is a jury who will punish me. "
The Associated Press said the case was a "circus", "an escaping train" and said that the case "grew into a worldwide sensation when thousands of people went to trial through direct and unintentional Web feeds". They added that the trials gathered "daily coverage of the cable news network and spawned a virtual home industry for talk shows" and, in the courthouse, "the whole case was transferred to a circus show like pulling dozens of fans every day to the courthouse as they marched to get opportunity to print only a few public seats open in the gallery "; "For his fans, the Arias trial becomes a live daytime sinetron." The Toronto Star said, "With a mixture of jealousy, religion, murder, and sex, the Jodi Arias case shows what happens when the judicial system becomes entertainment."
During the trial, community leaders freely expressed their opinion. "Jodi Arias has stated that he's following me on Twitter so I really hate to say he's guilty but unfortunately, he's just as guilty as that," Donald Trump wrote. He also offers Arias's legal advice on how he can avoid the maximum penalty. "Jodi should try, but the government should not make a deal - no jurors are stupid enough to let it go (but you never know, look at OJ & others)," Trump suggested. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer told reporters after an unrelated press event that he believed Arias was guilty. He ruled out the question of whether he believed Arias guilty of murder, murder or second-degree murder, but said, "I do not have all the information, but I think he is guilty."
The HLN staff and their commentators compared the case to Casey Anthony's case for the perceived similarity between Anthony and Arias and the emotion that the cases incited the general public. In addition, HLN aired a daily event that included a trial called HLN After Dark: The Jodi Arias Trial . The cable network sends a press release entitled "HLN No. 1 Among Ad-Supported Cables as Arias Pleads for Her Life", boasting that they are leading in the rankings. Release states: "HLN continues to be the leading rank and complete source for coverage of Jodi Arias Trial." On May 21, HLN ranks No.1 among cable-supported advertising networks from 1: 56p to 2: 15p (ET) as Arias takes an attitude to plead for his life in front of a jury that found him guilty of Alexander's murder. During that period, HLN out-delivered the competition between the two total audiences (2,540,000) and 25-54 demo viewers (691,000). 1 of the ad-supported cable networks for 2p hours gives 2,227,000 total viewers and 620,000 25-54 viewers. "
Jodi Arias: Dirty Little Secret , film made for television, Missing star actress Tania Raymonde as Arias and Jesse Lee Soffer, from The Mob Doctor, > as Alexander. Attorney Juan Martinez is played by Ugly Betty actor Tony Plana and David Zayas, from Dexter, playing Esteban Flores's detective. Created for and distributed by Lifetime Network, the film airs on June 22, 2013. The director is Jace Alexander, who in January 2016 was arrested on child pornography charges and pleaded guilty for promoting a child's sexual performance and having an obscene performance by A child.
Former detective for Siskiyou County, California, who arrested Arias at his grandparents' house after apparently he was traveling, is coming. He discusses his involvement in investigations and explosive experiments in a three-part limited series, aired mid-January 2018, on Investigation Discovery (ID) entitled "Jodi Arias: The Mystery of the American Murders." Special explores the death of Alexander and the next circus of law as Arias is put on trial.
Social media
At the end of January 2013, the artwork drawn by Arias goes on sale on eBay. The seller is his brother; he claimed that his profits were to cover the cost of family trips to court and "better food" for Arias when he was in jail.
On April 11, USA Today reported that during the testimony of defense witness Alyce LaViolette, extreme public outrage over her statement that Arias was a victim of domestic violence. Tweets and other social media posts attacked LaViolette's reputation. More than 500 negative reviews from LaViolette's unreleased book will appear on Amazon.com calling LaViolette a scam and a disgrace. "This is an electronic version of the mass murder," said Retired Magistrates Court Judge Maricopa County, Kenneth Fields. Attorney Anne Bremner, who said she received death threats after she gave legal advice in the Amanda Knox case, told The Huffington Post that the type of online ridicule and threats LaViolette received could affect lawyers and witnesses in high-profile courts. "That's something to take into account," Bremner said. "If I had a child, I would consider it more than that."
On 9 May, The Republic commented: "Jodi Arias's trial has become a social media magnet and when Arias was convicted on Wednesday for first-degree murder, Twitter and Facebook exploded in reaction, mostly to Arias , although many people tweeted on media coverage, such as the antics of HLN host Nancy Grace. During the trial, hard followers of the proceedings were accused of trying to use social media to intimidate witnesses, or otherwise affect the results, whether the effects were questionable, important. "
On May 24, Victoria Washington, who was one of Arias's lawyers until he had to resign in 2011 due to the conflict, said "Arias" led the lawyer, Nurmi, crushed in social media.At one point, a digital Internet instigator superimposed his face onto a photo The crime scene of Alexander died in his home bathroom in Mesa I know people are aggravated by him constantly making mistakes, but you have to create and preserve the record for federal review (on appeal.) Do not make a mistake, the appeals court will say you release it. "
On May 28th, Radar Online reported the jury's foreman has received threats since the panel deadlocked the punitive phase, and now his son claims he received death threats. "Today I read the letter of hatred that my father has got.Some people sent him a complete threat message with his email address, full name, and phone number (which at least meant this person had to retake Letter 101.) I also read some comments on a article online about my father Surreal They say my father was deceived by the defendant, that he was taken with him, that he hates prosecutors, "his son wrote on his public blog.
The Twitter account under the name Arias is operated by Arias friends on his behalf. On June 22, from the account, Arias tweeted, "It's just that I do not know whether I'll file an appeal or appeal."
On March 6, 2015, after a retrial of the penalty phase ended, it was reported that the jury # 17, the only one who survived, received death threats and police stationed at his home. Dennis Elias, the jury consultant, said, "The fact that people are making death threats and trying to overcome them is not a proud day for any of these people and they should feel ashamed."
See also
- Photography and courtroom broadcasting
- Crimes in Arizona
- Dale Harrell's murder
- Trial by media
Note
References
External links
- Glynn, Casey (May 21, 2013). "Jodi Arias: Timeline of a sensational murder case". CBSNews.com . CBS News.
- "Jodi Arias murder case: Timeline of events". Republic of Arizona. February 11, 2014.
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments